Matteo Covato vs Vladimir Uzhylovsky Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Uzhylovsky's recent second serve performance compare to Covato's? Uzhylovsky has a 0% success rate, while Covato has a significantly higher rate at 44.61%.
• In recent return games, Uzhylovsky has won 0% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Covato has won 43.71%, showing a clear advantage for Covato.
• Regarding first serve returns, Uzhylovsky again lags with 0%, while Covato achieves a 24.57% success rate.
• How do the players handle pressure situations like breakpoints? Uzhylovsky has saved 0%, but Covato has been successful in saving 55.7% of breakpoints.
• In terms of match outcomes over the past year, Uzhylovsky has won no matches (0/2), while Covato has a win rate of 43.64% (24/31).
• Which surfaces do the players perform best on? Uzhylovsky is strongest on Hard courts with a 58% win rate, whereas Covato performs best on Clay with a 49% win rate. On their weaker surfaces, Uzhylovsky has a 50% win rate on I.hard, while Covato has a 29% win rate on Hard.
• Analyzing the level of play: Uzhylovsky has struggled in Challenger/ITF > $10K tournaments, winning 0%, compared to Covato's 44.9% win rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments.
• Who has faced tougher opponents? Uzhylovsky's average opponent rank was 442, while Covato's was significantly higher at 227.62 over the past 12 months.
• In deciding set situations, Uzhylovsky has not won any, while Covato has a strong record, winning 58% of deciding sets.
• Break point opportunities have not been capitalized by Uzhylovsky (0%), while Covato has converted 17.58% of theirs, indicating a higher efficiency under pressure.

Editorial Prediction (August 17, 2025, UTC):

Within the last six months, statistical records indicate that Uzhylovsky has been unable to secure points on critical second-serve plays or return games, leading to zero percent effectiveness in these areas. In contrast, Covato showcases a dominant performance with 44.61% success on second serves and 43.71% on return points, placing him in a favorable position.

Additionally, pressure scenarios reveal Covato's advantage, with an impressive 55.7% breakpoint save rate when compared to Uzhylovsky's absence of success. The match history further tips in Covato's favor, underscoring a 43.64% win rate in the past year over Uzhylovsky's unfortunate complete loss record.

When evaluating surface performance, while Uzhylovsky demonstrates competence on Hard courts, Covato maintains the ability to outperform in tournaments with more formidable opponents, maintaining a solid record in deciding sets.

Given these factors, particularly Covato's superior handling of high-pressure situations, efficient breakpoint conversion, and stronger recent form, it can be reasonably predicted that Covato is the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.